- Research
- Africa
- Americas
- Asia
- Energy, Environment and Development
- Europe
- Global Health Security
- International Economics
- International Law
- International Security
- Middle East and North Africa
- Russia and Eurasia
This project aims to create a neutral ground where policy-makers and opinion leaders from different cultural backgrounds can come together and pragmatically discuss approaches to current strategic challenges.
The project takes as its starting point the recognition that the strategic environment in which policy-makers operate has become increasingly complex – and that they make decisions in a world of diverse risks rather than one of clear and concrete threats. The experience of the last decade has underlined the strategic reality that a state can rarely – if ever – effectively manage security risks on its own, and therefore must increasingly act with both partners and competitors though formal institutions, or via informal and flexible groupings. And yet there are clear cultural gaps between the United States and its Euro-Atlantic allies, and emerging powers such as China, Russia, Brazil, India and South Africa which often produce contrasting approaches to security. Moreover, in an era of severe financial anxiety, fierce competition for resources among countries often dictates policy. The aim of this project is to create a framework for dialogue that recognizes the inevitability of cultural difference and the divisive nature of the competition for resources.
More about the Project (pdf) >>
The project seeks to provide a framework for effective and meaningful discussion on security via a three-pronged approach of events, publications and creating a global network of those engaged in the project.
Within a global context, the project and its partners will conduct further high-level roundtable workshops in the United States, Sri Lanka, Indonesia, Norway, Austria, West Africa, and the Gulf. The key concepts and findings of these events will be disseminated through the publication of briefing papers and reports, in addition to concise op-eds in major international newspapers. Through these events and publications, the project aims to draw together a diverse group of individuals from contrasting cultural and disciplinary backgrounds who seek to affect change in security policy. As the project draws to a close, the final task is to present the summary findings in a clear and concise policy briefing to key decision-making units in several global capitals.
The project is guided and advised by a steering committee who determine the direction and focus of the project and associated meetings.
Cultural Dialogue: The Western Encounter with 'the Rest'
Programme Paper
Christopher Coker, December 2011
Managing Security Risks through Cross-Cultural Dialogue
Rapporteur Report, December 2011
The Role of Values in Counter-Insurgency and Stabilisation: Mil-Mil, Civ-Mil and 'Civ-Civ' Dialogue from the Balkans to South Asia
Rapporteur Report, September 2011
Cultural Dialogue in International Security: New Thinking for Europe and America
Programme Paper
Alexis Crow, September 2011
NATO's Crisis of Ambition
New York Times
Alexis Crow, June 2011
Cross-Cultural Dialogue in Euro-Atlantic Security and Defence
Roundtable Summary, May 2011
This project is kindly supported by The British Council, The Mitchell Group, the Goethe-Institut, and the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
For more information please contact Dr Alexis Crow.