Born in Hamilton in New Zealand in 1950, Helen Clark, you became involved with local politics as a young woman in 1974, before being elected to the national parliament in 1981. What was it like for you as a woman working in politics at the time?

I came from a political family. My father had strong political opinions and politics was talked about among my relatives. It was known that previous generations of my family had strong political views too so it wasn’t unusual for me to be interested in politics.

In 1968, when I went to university, it was an extremely political time in universities across the West as well. At Auckland University, there were growing student protests against New Zealand’s involvement in the war in Vietnam, apartheid in South Africa and the South Pacific being used as a nuclear testing ground by all of the nuclear powers which stimulated my interest in international affairs.

Student protests against the war in Vietnam, apartheid in South Africa and the South Pacific being used by nuclear powers, stimulated my interest in international affairs.

However, when I began running for office at the local and regional levels, and then at the national level, you had to be across all of the domestic issues too. Since I wanted future generations to enjoy the opportunities that I had as a young person – access to a free public hospital system, comprehensive social security since 1938 and affordable tertiary education – I focused on these policies throughout my political career. But, I found that, as a young woman, you could move along steadily, without obstacles, to a certain point. Then, when you started to go into territory which men had traditionally dominated, it became harder.

When I competed for the Labour Party’s nomination for the constituency, which I would go on to represent for 27 and a half years, I was the only woman candidate in a field of seven and there was gender-based opposition. Some people said, ‘She’ll never do any good because this is a working man’s electorate.’ This, of course, wasn’t justified because the numbers of female and male voters in the electorate were roughly equal. But, I began to sense that there were areas that people weren’t comfortable having women in, and that included being a Member of Parliament (MP).

Even though I was based in Auckland, our largest city, throughout my political career – a metropolis with around a third of New Zealand’s population – prior to my election in 1981, Auckland had only ever had one woman MP and she was elected in a by-election in 1941 and then defeated at a general election two years later in 1943. In addition, there had only been at that stage, as I recall, three women cabinet ministers in the history of New Zealand.

Nevertheless, women were slowly on the rise in our country’s politics and the year that I was elected saw the numbers of women MPs double from four to eight although out of a parliament of 92. We were a small and lonely minority. Yet there was empathy across party lines between the two conservative women MPs and six Labour women MPs. We had common interests as women in an overwhelmingly male environment where there wasn’t much expectation that women in politics would achieve much.

Indeed, my aspiration when I entered politics was to be able to do well enough to become a minister, but I never dreamed that I would end up becoming leader of the Labour Party for 15 years and prime minister for nine. That was territory that no woman had occupied before in New Zealand – and very few had around the world – but, over time, it became possible to climb up the ranks before becoming a minister in 1987.

Once I was Leader of the Labour Party and Leader of the Opposition, I faced gender-based criticism again. People weren’t used to the prospect of a woman becoming prime minister so there were attacks about my appearance, my voice and even my clothing. But I found that there was little point dwelling on such criticism. I just had to look straight ahead and get on with the task at hand and, by and large, that strategy worked for me.

I think women politicians today are more confident in being able to call out such behaviour than I was at a time when it was very rare to have many women in parliament.

You became the first woman to be elected as prime minister of New Zealand in 1999 and served until 2008. What did you find were the challenges for you as a woman taking up this mantle and, subsequently, during your time serving in the highest political office in the country?  

The main challenge for me was getting elected. But, what was of enormous assistance to me was that as Labour’s standing improved after the 1996 election, and as my standing as a prospective prime minister improved, the party in government replaced their male leader with a female leader, Jenny Shipley, so suddenly, New Zealanders were presented with, not only a female Leader of the Opposition, but also with a female prime minister. The 1999 election would see two women competing for the top job and I think that was tremendously helpful in normalizing having women in the top leadership of the country.

Having become prime minister, I became the first among equals in a team. People respected me as the leader. I did find, though, that towards the very end of my premiership, the opposition found ways to attack me again on a gender basis.

Interestingly, when I represented New Zealand at international meetings, I was always in a tiny minority of women leaders too. The APEC Leaders’ Meeting, for example, at the most would have three women at a table of 21. I went to four Commonwealth Leaders’ Meetings as well and there were perhaps two other women in a room of well over 50 men.

I recall, in 2000, I went to the UN Millennium Summit where Mary Robinson, the former president of Ireland and, at the time, the UN Human Rights Commissioner, convened a meeting of women heads of states and governments and the heads of UN entities. I can still remember the women leaders who were there. There was the prime minister of Bangladesh, the president of Latvia, the prime minister of Dominica and me. We would have fitted into two telephone boxes.

Globally, the situation hasn’t got a lot better since. The number of women leaders of UN member states is typically around 20. We have the unedifying spectacle now of the G7 and the G20 with no woman leader now that Angela Merkel has gone. The only woman you will likely see in the photos is Ursula von der Leyen of the European Commission so there is a long way to go at the international level. New Zealand, Iceland, Finland, Norway and Denmark, all small democracies, have been ahead of the pack but I would love to see more countries catch up.

Image 2

Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, President of the European Council, Charles Michel, US President, Joe Biden, Japanese Prime Minister, Yoshihide Suga, UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, Italian Prime Minister, Mario Draghi, French President, Emmanuel Macron, President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen and German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, pose during the G7 Summit last year in Cornwall in the UK in 2021. Photo: Leon Neal/WPA Pool via Getty Images.
Canadian Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, President of the European Council, Charles Michel, US President, Joe Biden, Japanese Prime Minister, Yoshihide Suga, UK Prime Minister, Boris Johnson, Italian Prime Minister, Mario Draghi, French President, Emmanuel Macron, President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen and German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, pose during the G7 Summit last year in Cornwall in the UK in 2021. Photo: Leon Neal/WPA Pool via Getty Images.

Content 2

Today, New Zealand is ranked 6th in the world for the number of women in its parliament after becoming the first country in the world to grant women the right to vote in 1893. Iriaka Rātana was the first Māori woman to become a member of parliament in 1949 and Nanaia Mahuta made history as New Zealand’s first Māori woman to become foreign minister in 2020. How far has the intersectionality of gender equality been realized across the country over the years?

As a young woman, my mother graduated as a teacher at the end of the Second World War and she found it so difficult to get a job. She had to travel hundreds of miles away from her home to get a permanent position. This was an era in which, when women married, they usually left the workforce, as my mother did.

Today, in the political sphere, however, New Zealand has had women prime ministers for 16 of the last 25 years. Its parliament is close to parity between men and women and 40 per cent of the cabinet is female. Overall, we see a lot of the gaps which that were there, being closed.

New Zealand has a journey to make but it’s not a journey without hope.

There is also much more awareness in New Zealand of the intersectionality of gender equality. Women are impacted differently by it, whether they be indigenous, ethnic minorities, LGBTQI+ or have disabilities.

Nanaia Mahuta, who was a minister in my government, is a fantastic role model for young Māori women. She is the first woman to become foreign minister and she is also an indigenous woman – so that’s a double first. If you look at the socio-economic status of Māori in general then it is lower than for the European population and Māori women are caught up in that vortex of inequality. These are significant issues for the country but there has also been the emergence of a considerable middle class among the Māori in the world of work too and Māori are also well represented in parliament. New Zealand has a journey to make but it’s not a journey without hope.

Indeed, when New Zealanders look at their parliament today, the chances are, they will see themselves represented whether it’s with the almost equal numbers of men and women or Māori and Pasifika MPs. There is a wonderful MP who came to New Zealand as a refugee from Eritrea. He has an incredible story of having literally walked away from conscription in Eritrea, to Sudan, before coming to New Zealand. He’s now an MP so, despite the inequalities that still exist in New Zealand, there is also a lot of hope.

In 2020, as the coronavirus crisis raged across the world, countries with the strongest response were led by women. One of these leaders was current Prime Minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern, who became the second woman, after you, in the history of the Labour Party to lead the country. Since coming to office, she has been praised for her style of leadership when addressing issues ranging from terrorism to the pandemic. Why has her style of leadership been so effective?

Jacinda Ardern worked in my office as a graduate before getting experience working in the UK and then returning home to become an MP in 2008. She was a surprise leader of the Labour Party in 2017 at the age of 37, but when she stepped up, she was ready. She turned the election campaign on its head and, although as the campaign went on, the opposition made some dents, she became the prime minister of a coalition government.

The priority for women leaders during the pandemic was to preserve the health and wellbeing of their people and, it turns out, that has been a great economic strategy as well.

The style Jacinda has is authentic. She is kind, she is firm and she is clearly the captain of the ship. That’s been seen as she has dealt with a series of major crises, from the terrorist attack on the Muslim community in Christchurch, to the volcanic eruption [on White Island], and then to the pandemic which has preoccupied her, as it’s preoccupied us all, over the last two years. It has been tough but Jacinda has set the tone. 

During the pandemic, I think the reason women leaders did so well is because they took a people-centred approach. Where some countries tried to say, ‘We’ve got to look after the economy first,’ that was a disaster in health terms. You can’t have a strong economy when people are falling ill all around you. The priority for women leaders was to preserve the health and wellbeing of their people. It turns out that has been a great economic strategy as well. For New Zealand, for example, we have had exponentially the lowest death rate from COVID-19 in the OECD while we have also had the fifth best economic growth rate too. 

Image 3

New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, meets staff members of Te Puna Ora o Mataatua on 9 September 2020 in Whakatane, New Zealand. Te Puna Ora o Mataatua are a health, medical, social and employment provider who have played a key role in the response to tackling COVID-19 in local communities. Photo: John Borren via Getty Images.
New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, meets staff members of Te Puna Ora o Mataatua on 9 September 2020 in Whakatane, New Zealand. Te Puna Ora o Mataatua are a health, medical, social and employment provider who have played a key role in the response to tackling COVID-19 in local communities. Photo: John Borren via Getty Images.

Content 3

How far do you think the notion of toxic masculinity is an issue in politics at this moment in history in light of the growth of strong-man leadership around the world in recent years, which you, along with other women leaders, recently argued has led to a deterioration of women’s rights globally?

Does anyone think we would have an invasion of Ukraine today if there was a leader like Jacinda in Russia? Whether it’s in Ukraine, Ethiopia, Syria or Yemen, the callous disregard for human life lost in conflict is shocking. Solutions to intractable problems can be found with a different style of leadership. In my opinion, a lot of our problems would be well on the way to resolution if we could sweep out layers of male leadership and put female leaders in.

Whether it’s in Ukraine, Ethiopia, Syria or Yemen, the disregard for human life lost in conflict is shocking and solutions can be found with a different style of leadership.

Needless to say, there have been excellent male leaders too. Barack Obama was a standout male leader who was serious but caring. I also admire French President, Emmanuel Macron, who continues to engage with Russian President Vladimir Putin despite the ongoing invasion of Ukraine.

But women leaders have stepped up extremely well in recent years. From Barbados’ Mia Mottley, to Taiwan’s Tsai Ing-wen, there’s been some incredible role models. I think this has made the public more aware of the style which women bring to leadership – being empathetic, listening to the experts and being consultative with the public – as opposed to the kind of style we see in many countries led by men.

Following a career in national politics, you would go on to become the first woman to lead the United Nations Development Programme before running to become, what would have been, the first woman to lead the United Nations before losing to current secretary-general, António Guterres, in 2016. You subsequently said that this was a blow for women. On reflection, how do you think about this time and what do you think it will take for a woman to lead the United Nations in the future?

I was the first – and only – woman administrator of the UNDP. I was succeeded by a man and I was preceded by a series of men. But the majority of the candidates for the position of UN secretary-general in 2016 were women. In retrospect, none of us had a chance, despite being as well – if not better – qualified than the men. But we were competing in a context where most countries had never had a woman leader.  

Women of my generation have had to fight our way to the top. We are resilient, we are strong and we are often independent-minded.

Women of my generation have had to fight our way to the top. We are resilient and we are strong and we are often independent-minded. [Laughs] That is not necessarily what most of the permanent five members of the United Nations Security Council are looking for. The exception to this was the United Kingdom. For others, however, strong women can be seen as threatening. Indeed, it was once said to me that my strength was my weakness.

The outcome of that election was that the ninth UN secretary-general in a row is male. But, I think that when the position comes up again, the race will be on. The next UN secretary-general will likely be from the Latin America and the Caribbean group and I think it’s highly likely that the successful candidate will be a woman. I, for one, will certainly be supporting that. In a sense, the election in 2016 was a watershed moment, the women were there but weren’t being taken seriously.

Image 3

A woman walks along the United Nations hallway before a meeting with candidates competing for the position of UN secretary-general on 14 April 2016 in New York, US. At least eight candidates are running for the office – four men and four women. A woman selection would be the first for the UN and one of the top canadiates is former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark. Photo: Eduardo Munoz Alvarez via Getty Images.
A woman walks along the United Nations hallway before a meeting with candidates competing for the position of UN secretary-general on 14 April 2016 in New York, US. At least eight candidates are running for the office – four men and four women. A woman selection would be the first for the UN and one of the top canadiates is former New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark. Photo: Eduardo Munoz Alvarez via Getty Images.

Content 4

Crises are erupting all across the world. Last year, following the US withdrawal from Afghanistan, the Taliban came back to power, threatening progress made over the last 20 years for women and girls. Having sent New Zealand to Afghanistan in 2001 when you were prime minister, six months after the takeover, how do you feel about the future for women and girls across the country?

My view is that the people of Afghanistan have been horribly let down. Realizing peace in Afghanistan was not a 20 year project – it was a 100 year project – but the West walked away and, in doing so, abandoned all of the Afghans who had hopes for a better life. There are now almost 40 million people in Afghanistan living with the consequences of the West walking away and it’s devastating.   

The Taliban has come back to power and is not providing any constitutional process through which Afghans can debate and determine the future of their country. Its government does not include a single woman and has very little ethnic diversity.

Indeed, the last rule of the Taliban in the 1990s was terrible for women in particular and, since the takeover, a lot of women and girls have not been able to return to their education though the Taliban has recently been saying that they will reopen schools for girls on 21 March 2022 but let’s see whether that happens or not. Meanwhile, the UN is reporting large scale systemic discrimination on the grounds of gender across the country.

It’s also been tragic to see the increase in the rate of child marriages among impoverished families. I last went to Afghanistan in 2019 and saw the impact of a programme aimed at ending child marriage. I met families where 12-year-old girls had not been sold because of that programme. Will there be anyone to rescue girls now? We’ve abandoned women and girls across Afghanistan and it will be a long way back.

From the conflict in Ethiopia, which you recently said could lead to genocide, to the war in Ukraine, where the spectre of violence against women and girls looms over the more than 1 million refugees who have fled since the war began, women and girls are thought to be among the greatest casualties of crises. What are your thoughts about what is going on in Ethiopia and now in Ukraine?

In the ugliest of conflicts, women and girls suffer immensely from violence. There’s no question in my mind that women and girls in Tigray have been subjected to the most horrific crimes including rape being used as a weapon of war by Eritrean soldiers, Ethiopian soldiers and militias. One day, I hope those responsible will stand in the dock at the International Criminal Court at The Hague or in tribunals in Ethiopia to face accountability for these crimes.

Women and children are fleeing Ukraine knowing they may never see their brothers, husbands and fathers again. 

There are other war crimes being committed there too. It’s a war crime to starve a population. There have been summary executions and the destruction of health facilities. It’s disastrous.

I have visited Tigray in the past. I’ve walked through the fields to the ancient monuments, climbed the cliffs to the churches and seen the rich culture and heritage. It was a peaceful part of Ethiopia in recent decades and that peace has been shattered.

With Ukraine, we see men aged between 18 and 60 mobilized to fight for their country. Many women and children are fleeing knowing they may never see their brothers, husbands and fathers again. It’s shocking. Who would have thought we would see a refugee crisis like this in Europe in the 21st century? It’s reminiscent of the Second World War and of people trying to escape the wars in the Balkans in the 1990s. There needs to be a ceasefire and then genuine negotiations about the future of Ukraine otherwise there’ll be a lot more suffering.

Image 4

Two Ukrainian women can be seen through the window of a train that has arrived from Ukraine to Przemysl train station in Poland on 3 March 2022. Thousands of refugees have been fleeing war to the Polish border town of Przemysl. Photo: Attila Husejnow/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images.
Two Ukrainian women can be seen through the window of a train that has arrived from Ukraine to Przemysl train station in Poland on 3 March 2022. Thousands of refugees have been fleeing war to the Polish border town of Przemysl. Photo: Attila Husejnow/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images.

Content 5

Finally, a crisis that perhaps presents a different threat to humanity altogether, is climate change. Last week, the IPCC published a report detailing how half of the global population is under threat from water scarcity, hunger and disease. Michelle Bachelet spoke to me about how climate change and gender equality are inextricably linked. What, in your opinion, should world leaders be doing to address the climate crisis?

We need the energy transition to accelerate. Despite the leadership of the UK at COP26 last year, there was not a strong enough outcome on the necessary phase out of coal because there’s not the political will among those addicted to coal to move on from it.

We also need to stop deforestation but tell that to Brazilian President, Jair Bolsonaro, who has presided over the most dreadful rate of deforestation of the Amazon. The health of the Amazon, the great forests of the Congo Basin and of Papua New Guinea and Indonesia is crucial for the world. If countries don’t stop deforestation, habitat destruction and land degradation, then we won’t be able to defeat the climate crisis.

I wonder why we have deserved to have both the worst global health crisis since 1918 and the greatest European security crisis since 1945.

There is also another set of negotiations at the UN at the moment for a new high seas treaty building on the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea by addressing marine biodiversity beyond natural jurisdictions. Roughly 95 per cent of the world’s ocean is not behind national boundaries, and there is little global governance over it, so we need rules to protect it. This is critical because the health of the ocean matters in addressing climate change.

I recall in 2018 being at a conference where senior IPCC officials were briefing delegates on their latest report at the time. They said that it was feasible geophysically, economically and even technologically to reach the aspirations of the Paris Agreement to limit global warming to 1.5°C. But, what they didn’t say was, is it politically feasible? Because the obstacles are all political.

Content 2

The challenge now is to try to muster that political will in a polarized world. We saw some hope last year when John Kerry and his long-time counterpart from China, Xie Zhenhua, came together to forge a US-China agreement. But what chance now is there of cooperation on climate issues with Russia given the current heightened state of global security?

I sometimes wonder why we have deserved to have both the worst global health crisis since 1918 and the greatest European security crisis since 1945, which could soon become a global security crisis, over the last two years. I think it will take very wise heads, and a lot of willingness on all sides, to reach compromise in order to get the world out of all of the fixes that it’s in.