New US attacks on the Houthis will not bring Iran to the negotiating table – but could provoke worse violence

The Houthis are the one member of the Axis of Resistance that grew stronger over the last year. But airstrikes will not deter their attacks on Red Sea shipping or influence Tehran.

Expert comment Published 18 March 2025 Updated 16 April 2025 4 minute READ

US strikes against the Houthis in Yemen on 15 March were the heaviest since joint US/UK air operations began in January 2024. They were also the first under the new administration of President Donald Trump. Sending a clear message to Tehran, the president said afterwards that ‘every shot fired by the Houthis will be looked upon…as being a shot fired from the weapons and leadership of Iran’.

The attacks, and Trump’s explicit association of the Houthis with Iran, were not surprising. One of the most important consequences of the wars that followed the 7 October 2023 attacks has been the heightened importance of the Houthis within the Iran-led Axis of Resistance. Since 7 October, their hundreds of attacks on Red Sea shipping, and numerous drone and missile launches against Israel, have formed an important element of the Axis response to the war in Gaza.

Meanwhile, Axis members Hamas and Hezbollah have been badly weakened by Israel during 2024, notably through the decapitation of their leaderships. The Assad regime in Syria collapsed in December, costing Tehran its key state ally in the Axis.

Even Iran has been weakened. Its missile and drone attacks on Israel last year were largely ineffectual as Israeli air defences functioned effectively. In contrast, Israel’s strikes on Iran were surgical: the second attack in October destroyed several air defence sites and a key missile production facility. The message was that in the event of another direct confrontation, Israel could inflict significantly more damage.  

The Houthis are the only Axis member to have seen their position strengthened over the last year. The continued fragmentation of Yemen’s internationally recognized government means that the Houthis’ political and military power remains dominant. Their projection of power in the Red Sea has allowed them to establish a global presence. And their attacks on shipping, which they frame as being in solidarity with Palestinians, have embarrassed Arab regimes, whose relative inaction is a source of resentment in their populations.

But it is a mistake to characterize the Houthis as merely an extension of Iran. That perception cannot form the basis of an effective policy.

Iranian support

It is true that the Houthis would not be where they are today without Iran’s support – a relationship that expanded after the Arab uprisings, as a means to counter Saudi Arabia. Even after the Saudi-sponsored truce in Yemen’s civil war of April 2022, Iran’s support has not decreased. In fact, the smuggling of weapons, fuel, and technology to the Houthis has increased, while the Houthis have continued to build up their locally generated military capabilities.  

The Houthis…have demonstrated a much greater tolerance for risk than Tehran.

The Houthis’ growing strength undeniably benefits Iran, providing it with a partner on the southwestern tip of the Arabian Peninsula, right beneath its Saudi rival. Iran’s longer-term objective is to see the consolidation and institutionalization of Houthi power, while Tehran continues a ‘hands-off strategy’, exercising a degree of plausible deniability.

In practical terms, this means that Iran encourages the Houthis playing a more important regional role within the Axis. That is why it supports the Houthis in building their regional presence, notably in Iraq and the Horn of Africa. 

Diverging interests

That said, there are divergences between Iranian and Houthi interests. The Houthis in particular have demonstrated a much greater tolerance for risk than Tehran. After 7 October, Iran was sceptical about the Houthis launching attacks in the Red Sea, fearing an escalation – yet the Houthis proceeded regardless. Their higher risk tolerance is driven first by excessive confidence – borne out of their dominance inside Yemen and ability to resist years of Saudi and Emirati strikes – and second by their aggressive and expansive ideology. Iran, in contrast, has been careful over the years to calibrate its provocations and to avoid direct confrontation with the US and Israel.

This implies that Iran will hold reservations about the Houthis’ aggressive agenda, especially in the Red Sea. The fear will be that the Houthis could entangle the Islamic Republic in a new round of violence. Moreover, should the truce in Yemen collapse, the prospect of renewed Houthi attacks against Saudi Arabia and the UAE would increase, risking even further destabilizing the region, and threatening the recent warming of relations between Tehran and Riyadh.

Trump’s impact

The arrival of the second Trump administration further changes the equation. The Houthis have already clearly stated that they will retaliate against those who implement the Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) designation, announced by Washington in January 2025.

If the strikes are meant to force Iran to the negotiation table, they are unlikely to succeed: rather Tehran will feel compelled to continue, if not amplify its support for the Houthis.

Should this lead to the suspension of fuel imports through the port of Hudaydah (one of the Houthis’ four main sources of revenue), they would likely jettison their commitment to a de facto cross-border truce with Saudi Arabia. 

The FTO designation will also compel the Houthis to further steer their economy away from formal banks and towards informal mechanisms, including money exchanges and Hawala transfer systems. They are also already important investors in the crypto world.  

Article 2nd half

In a worst-case scenario, there would be a resumption of direct hostilities between the Houthis and Saudi Arabia. Both sides have been trying to avoid breaking the truce, but in practice who eventually shoots first might be irrelevant, especially if the US uses Saudi airspace to strike at Yemen.

The renewed and much more expansive US air and naval strikes are unlikely to deter the Houthis. They will again make use of Yemen’s mountainous terrain to go underground and hide. Their infrastructure is already scattered throughout the country, including in dense urban areas. The strikes’ main effect is making it more likely that the Houthis increase attacks on American and Western shipping and resume drone and missile attacks against Israel.

Washington must avoid acting in Yemen without at least coordinating with its regional allies in the Gulf.

Iran is unlikely to retaliate directly. If the strikes are meant to force Tehran to the negotiation table, they will probably not succeed: rather it will feel compelled to continue, if not amplify its support for the Houthis – as the one largely intact member of its Axis.

If the Trump administration truly wants to weaken and eventually defeat the Houthis, it should begin with a genuine, long-term effort to support sustainable peace in Yemen. 

This will require strengthening the internationally recognized Presidential Leadership Council, both politically and possibly militarily. In the absence of a strong and united anti-Houthi front, the current policy risks only accelerating the fragmentation of Yemen and prolonging its instability.

The US must also intensify efforts to counter the smuggling of weapons and fuel to the Houthis from Iran and Iraq, particularly via the sea, and identify and freeze the Houthis’ economic interests outside of Yemen. 

Regardless, Washington must avoid acting in Yemen without at least coordinating with its regional allies in the Gulf, specifically the UAE and Saudi Arabia. At the very least, these two countries – who have experienced a failed war against the Houthis – understand what strategies do not work with the group and in Yemen overall.