The circular economy provides opportunities to improve the balance between local, regional and global trade, but it will take political will and potentially the renegotiation of free-trade agreements to achieve this.
The COVID-19 pandemic has severely impacted LAC supply chains and trade, in terms of both imports and exports. Imports of parts and components required in the electronics, automotive, textiles and pharmaceuticals sectors of Argentina, Brazil and Mexico have been negatively affected by diminished production in China and by disrupted global supply chains. On the other hand, reduced global demand has caused price shocks in key commodities produced by the region, including the sudden plummeting of prices for oil (60 per cent), copper (22 per cent), sugar (20 per cent) and coffee (18 per cent). Such developments have a proportionally greater economic impact for many LAC countries, which rely heavily on exports. The pandemic has also highlighted the key role that China plays as a consumer of LAC-produced commodities: Chinese demand for soya and copper has declined, but it used to absorb 79 per cent of Brazilian soya production and 60 per cent of Peruvian copper. Overall, it is expected that merchandise trade could decline by between 12 per cent and 31 per cent in 2020 for South and Central American countries, compared to 2019.
It is unlikely that trade relations will bounce back to ‘normal’ in the post-COVID-19 economic recovery. In addition, value chains are expected to change further during the global transition to a circular economy, as new approaches to create more resilient production and consumption systems are developed. A circular economy perspective on trade can enable a better balance between local, regional and global trade, and boost resilience.
Many countries in the region rely on imported consumer goods produced by the manufacturing sectors of industrialized economies, in particular North America and Asia. After use and consumption, these goods end up in local waste streams, and are mostly landfilled or illegally dumped. Free-trade agreements (FTAs) between LAC states and their trading partners generally have not included clauses about EPR for local waste streams associated with imported goods. To enable more circularity of materials in trade agreements and reduce pressure on local waste management systems, there is a strong case for including EPR policies in existing and new FTAs. Exporting producer countries would be required to take responsibility for end-of-life products in the recipient country. In the case of Panama, studies show that up to 34.5 per cent of valued materials derived from goods imported through FTAs could be exported back to the country of origin, and the amount of waste discarded in landfills could be significantly reduced, if EPR clauses were part of existing FTAs.
The national recycling markets in LAC countries focus mainly on the recovery and recycling of paper, cardboard, scrap metal (ferrous metals), some plastics and glass.
In addition, the LAC region is involved in the trade of various secondary materials, scrap and waste products. The national recycling markets in these countries focus mainly on the recovery and recycling of paper, cardboard, scrap metal (ferrous metals), some plastics (PET and high-density polyethylene – HDPE) and glass. LAC countries are also importers of paper, cardboard and scrap metal, mainly from the US. According to UNEP, in 2013, some 455,000 tonnes of scrap metal were imported from the US by Peru and Ecuador alone. Intra-regional trade in scrap metals was predominantly characterized by exports from Venezuela (which sold 86,000 tonnes to Colombia and Ecuador) and Costa Rica (which sold 25,000 tonnes to Ecuador and Panama). Trade in waste plastics was dominated in 2013 by exports from the region to China and the US. Together, Colombia, Ecuador, Panama and Peru exported 60,000 tonnes to those two major economies, with 41,000 tonnes exported to China from Ecuador and Peru alone, and 11,000 tonnes from Ecuador to the US.
As noted above, the circular economy offers opportunities to increase the valorization of waste at the national level. In the case of e-waste, currently the region is focused on dismantling while sending the valuable fraction to Europe, the US and China for recovery of precious and rare metals including gold, lithium and cobalt. To do this domestically requires investment in new facilities and programmes for safe recovery of e-waste. The national regulations around hazardous waste would need to be harmonized and expanded to the regional level and allow the consolidation of e-waste in large enough quantities to supply the necessary input for recovery facilities.