Laurel Rapp: ‘There’s no going back to the America of the past decade’

The director of Chatham House’s US and North America programme on why the 250th anniversary of US independence is likely to further polarize Americans.

The World Today

Published 15 June 2026 — 3 minute READ

Image — People watch the Independence Day parade in Washington, DC, on July 4, 2019. This year's 250th celebrations are expected to be polarized. Photo: Saul Loeb/ AFP via Getty Images.

Sara Seth

Communications Officer, Communications and Publishing

What was your path to a career in international affairs?

I grew up in a small town outside New York City, and found myself drawn to the world beyond the United States. After working as a researcher on political participation in Morocco for a year, I decided I wanted to be a diplomat. I spent the 14 years before I joined Chatham House at the US State Department, mostly in Washington, focused on America’s role in the Middle East and its approach to the United Nations.

Trying to find the balance between human rights and security interests was an introduction to the hard trade-offs policymakers must weigh up.

My first job in the State Department was during the Arab Spring as the sole expert on Bahrain, where the US has its largest naval base in the Middle East. My role was to help the US navigate this tumultuous moment. Trying to find the balance between human rights and security interests was difficult and a fascinating introduction to the hard trade-offs policymakers must weigh up.

At Chatham House, I look at how US and Canadian foreign policy is shaped from the outside, and how it affects people in the UK and globally. The topics are similar, but at the State Department I was working on shorter timelines under crises and focused on behind-the-scenes coordination between the White House, Pentagon and the intelligence community. Now I have a much more public-facing role, which is exciting.

As an American in Britain, how do you see the state of the US relationship with Europe?

I have rich conversations here in London about the direction of the US under this administration and beyond. Many are about whether this is just a moment in US foreign policy driven by who is in the White House, or a more deeply animated set of American interests and values that the US public, businesses and civil society want to see.

A lot of trust in the steadiness and the predictability of the US has been eroded, which you can’t rebuild overnight.

We don’t know where American voters are going to land on this question, but we’ll get a sense during the midterm elections in November. My view is that there’s no going back to what existed in the past decade, or even the last couple of years. A lot of trust in the steadiness and the predictability of the US has been eroded, and it isn’t something that you can rebuild overnight. Whoever takes office next will set a new US foreign policy direction, and right now Americans are trying to define that vision. 

It won’t be what it was before, but there is so much that connects the US and Europe that gives me optimism for the future. For the past decade the US has been pushing Europe to shoulder a greater defence burden, and Europe is getting the message and seeing mutual benefit in the approach. 

content continued

Another area for future coordination is China. Both parties would have more leverage with Beijing if there was more convergence around a set of shared goals, though this continues to be challenging.

Next month will mark the 250th anniversary of America’s independence. What’s the mood over there?

We are in a moment of political polarization and Americans are divided about how to mark the anniversary. Two distinct efforts are under way. A non-partisan commission, ‘America 250’, has been curating public events since its appointment by Congress in 2016, focused on school visits to historic sites and volunteerism. By contrast, President Trump’s newly launched ‘Freedom 250’ offers a more partisan presentation of US history, an emphasis on American faith and prayer and a mixed martial arts event at the White House.

It’s a similar split-screen moment to the rival Super Bowl half-time show with country rock singer Kid Rock that was held to protest the selection of hip hop artist Bad Bunny for the official half-time show. (Bad Bunny is from Puerto Rico, a US territory, and sang in Spanish.)

At Chatham House, we are marking the anniversary with four public events on some of the enduring debates in US politics. If you’ve seen the musical Hamilton, you’ll have heard them in the form of rap battles between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Our next Chatham House debate is on open trade vs protectionism on 15 July.

For me personally, it’s the first 4th of July that I won’t be celebrating with family back in the US, so we’ll be making new traditions here. Purchasing a grill will be a priority!

To read more from the summer issue of The World Today click here.