By any yardstick, Rahul Gandhi’s disqualification as a member of the Indian Parliament the day after being convicted in a defamation case, and the rapid move by a court in Gujarat to sentence him to two years in prison, has been an exercise in unprecedented judicial alacrity.
The complaint was filed against Gandhi – the great-grandson of the first prime minister of India Jawaharlal Nehru – by a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) lawmaker from Gujarat in 2019 over a remark which, it is claimed, defames the entire Modi community – a group of unrelated people, mostly traders, who settled in Gujarat and a few other adjoining states in India.
For legal pundits in India, the case is unusual for many reasons. The litigant Purnesh Modi – with no relation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi – sought to delay proceedings for almost 12 months which is considered a strange move as such a step would normally be chosen by the accused.
Also, as Gandhi is a resident of Delhi and not Gujarat, there are concerns the Gujarat judge who sentenced him may not have been following due process by proceeding against someone who is a resident outside of his territorial jurisdiction.
Finally, there appears to be no known legal precedent in India supporting a defamation claim which does not specifically refer to the plaintiff but rather to a generic group of people.
Gandhi’s enhanced public profile
But what is widely accepted is that the move to charge Gandhi with a defamation case was decidedly political.
Gandhi’s recent 4,000 km-long Bharat Jodo Yatra (Unite India March) has not only galvanized public support for his Indian National Congress party in a pre-general election year, it has also raised Gandhi’s appeal among common people and thrust his party into a position of being a viable challenger to the BJP.
In recent years, Gandhi has emerged as a vociferous critic of Modi, and has repeatedly launched attacks against the prime minister on his links with controversial businessman Gautam Adani. Many, including some in the Congress Party, allege these reasons are behind the move to disqualify Gandhi from the upcoming general election.
What happens next is hard to predict, but the case and subsequent legal sentence, has once again cast a dent on India’s global image of being a liberal democracy.
In February 2023, the Indian Tax department conducted systematic ‘surveys’ searching BBC offices in Delhi and Mumbai, less than a month after the Indian government had deployed emergency powers to ban the two-part documentary India: The Modi Question which was heavily critical of the prime minister.