China’s leaders’ meeting confirms Xi’s authority and shows technological self-reliance is now the priority

At the Fourth Plenum of the Communist Party of China’s leadership, President Xi Jinping outlined a bold shift in China’s economic development model under its next Five-Year Plan.

Expert comment

Published 28 October 2025 — 4 minute READ

Image — Senior Chinese officials arrive for a press conference of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China in Beijing on 24 October 2025. Photo by PEDRO PARDO/AFP via Getty Images.

Any large organization, whether a global conglomerate, a government or a political party, must grapple with two perennial challenges when its top leadership gathers: people and money. 

China’s ruling Communist Party is no exception. Last week’s four-day, closed-door Fourth Plenary Session of the 20th CPC Central Committee – known as the Fourth Plenum – offered a rare glimpse into how Beijing manages both. However bureaucratic the name may sound, the meeting’s global implications are difficult to overlook amid intensifying US–China tensions.

On personnel matters, international observers were quick to speculate about the winners and losers in this latest political reshuffle. The official communiqué confirmed the expulsion of 11 full Central Committee members and four alternate members (out of a total of 205 full and 171 alternate members respectively). This was the biggest expulsion of members since 2017 and shows the vigour with which the anti-corruption campaign is being carried out within the upper echelons of the party.  

It also appointed General Zhang Shengmin as a new vice chair of the Central Military Commission. His elevation to this new position illustrates that President Xi will continue to place his campaign against corruption at the heart of senior PLA leadership. None of the dismissals or changes came as a surprise – most had been announced in advance – but the sheer scale of the reshuffle once again underscored President Xi’s unchallenged authority at the top of China’s political hierarchy.

On the economic front, this plenum set the stage for drafting China’s 15th Five-Year Plan – the country’s latest roadmap for its economic and industrial strategy covering 2026-2030. Since the founding of the People’s Republic, each Five-Year Plan has served as the backbone of Beijing’s policy direction. The plans have outlined not just where the leadership intends to steer the economy, but also how it wants to shape China’s place in the world.

A shift in economic priority

The Fourth Plenum proposed the core features of the upcoming 15th Five-Year Plan, which is expected to be made public in full early next year. 

Judging from the published communiqué from the meeting, the key themes from the upcoming Five-Year Plan signal a clear break from every plan since the ‘reform and opening up’ era began under the leadership of Deng Xiaoping in 1978. It marks the final consolidation of the shift to use technology as the main driver of the economy. Under Deng and his successors through to President Xi, China’s Five-Year Plans have focused on nominal economic growth as a top priority. 

This time, the leadership is putting economic security on an equal footing with prosperity generation. The days of single-mindedly chasing nominal GDP growth are firmly a thing of the past. Instead, the current intense focus on addressing technological chokepoints reflects Beijing’s concerns about the extent of the country’s dependence on overseas suppliers for high-end technologies. 

Global economists hoping to see a renewed focus on domestic consumption are likely to be disappointed by the plenum’s direction for the Five-Year Plan. They argue that China needs to consume more to get the economy back to a reasonable level of growth and manage its trade surplus with the rest of the world.  But for China’s leaders, increasing domestic consumption is no longer the top priority. 

This time, the leadership is putting economic security on an equal footing with prosperity generation. 

Instead, the new Five-Year Plan signals a decisive shift in China’s growth model. It moves away from a focus on headline growth rates and towards building a resilient economy anchored in domestic innovation and fortified manufacturing supply chains capable of weathering, as the communiqué puts it, ‘even dangerous storms.’ At the heart of this transition lies Beijing’s long-term pursuit of economic and technological self-reliance.

Foreign observers should not expect Beijing to revive its sluggish property market or grant more financial autonomy to local governments. The direction is clear: expect deeper central government intervention, with capital and policy support channelled into strategic and high-tech sectors. Beijing will continue to coordinate from the centre in its ‘whole of nation’ approach. 

Over the next five years, the Party’s overarching goal is to make China a global champion in innovation. The vision is of a nation that not only produces technology but defines its frontiers and global standards. And this innovation must be widely applied into advanced manufacturing to generate national incomes. As the communiqué underscores, ‘the share of advanced manufacturing in the national economy should be kept at an appropriate level.’

Article second half

In its ongoing trade battles with the US and Europe, Beijing has already demonstrated how its integrated manufacturing base and near-monopoly over critical minerals can serve as stronger leverage in negotiations. The upcoming Five-Year Plan appears poised to refine this strategy, institutionalizing the lessons of recent trade tensions into a long-term playbook to manage its so-called great power competition with the US.

For China’s leaders, increasing domestic consumption is no longer the top priority. 

Yet such ambitions come with risks. China’s industrial drive may exacerbate not only frictions with the West but also generate pushback from emerging economies that are developing their advanced manufacturing. Many of these emerging economies were inspired by China’s own model and will seek to develop their own industries rather than rely on Beijing. 

A delicate balance

The challenge for Beijing is to strike a delicate balance: prioritizing technological self-reliance while ensuring job creation and income growth for its younger generation. The focus on technological self-reliance implies a shift towards fewer, more specialized jobs, in contrast to the more mass employment provided by property sector and fin-tech conglomerates. 

This balance is a particularly delicate one as the younger generation are feeling more economic pain than their parents’ generation due in part to much higher property prices and the cost of primary and secondary education. The communiqué suggests the leadership is aware of these social pressures. Its renewed emphasis on ‘common prosperity’ – first introduced in 2021 to address income and welfare disparities – signals that social stability remains central to China’s development agenda. 

The Chinese leadership’s long-term vision is clear: by 2035, China aims to lift its per capita GDP to the level of a mid-tier developed nation. And this Five-Year Plan should serve as a booster to accelerate the process.

Achieving that aim, however, may prove the hardest task of all. To make advanced manufacturing the main engine of growth without dragging overall economic expansion to levels that erode household wealth is a delicate balancing act. While the Communist Party faces no electoral tests, rising inequality and frustration from younger generation could still undermine its authority if the population’s economic pain is left unaddressed. 

Since its inception a hundred years ago, the Chinese Communist Party has survived by managing its contradictions. But this latest contradiction, between greater economic security for the nation and the creation of prosperity for its citizens, seems even harder to overcome.

In the years ahead, China’s ability to reconcile stability with growth will determine not only the success of its economic experiment but also the durability of its political model. This is why this 15th Five-Year Plan should be treated with great attention by the rest of the world.