US Presidential Election: The Empire Votes Back

There are several ways of thinking about American presidential elections: as a monstrous waste of money fought by two rich party machines to decide who will run the country in the best interests of the corporations – the Noam Chomsky view; as a power struggle engaged in by inflated egoists with few principles and even fewer ideas – the line promoted by journalists late at night; as a contest so unimportant and so far removed from the lives of ordinary people that it is hardly surprising that fewer and fewer ever bother to vote – the cynic’s perspective; or as a sign of real political vitality in one of the largest and undoubtedly the best democracy in the world – the view adopted by most Americans.

The World Today

Published 1 August 2004

Updated 19 October 2020 — 4 minute READ

The American presidential elections are tests of public opinion, which ask of those who do happen to vote a startlingly simple question: why should I support this candidate rather than that one? The normal answer under normal circumstances has invariably been: because I share the candidate’s prejudices and will thus vote for him – never her; because he looks and talks like a president, and is likely to make me and my nearest and dearest feel safer, more secure, and hopefully better off.

It also helps a candidate’s chances – or at least the incumbent’s – if the US happens to be engaged in a just war against a ruthless and aggressive enemy. America after all is a nation of patriots, and as such is more likely to fall in behind a president leading the country at a time of national emergency, as President George Bush most obviously is.

Access the archive

The current issue is open access with previous editions reserved for our members and magazine subscribers.

Subscribe