Putin’s Carlson interview shows the links between Trump talk and Russian messaging

The interview served up Putin’s dense justifications for his war in Ukraine. It also displayed the common ground he shares with leading Trump supporters.

Expert comment Updated 1 May 2024 Published 9 February 2024 3 minute READ

In 2019 Vladislav Surkov, a close advisor to Putin and one of his chief ideologues, wrote: ‘Foreign politicians attribute to Russia interference in elections and referendums across the planet. In fact, the matter is even more serious – Russia is interfering in their brains, and they do not know what to do with their own altered consciousness.’ 

Surkov has since been disgraced, but Russia’s insidious information warfare escalated to new heights on 8 February with the broadcast of US pundit Tucker Carlson’s interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin. 

On X (formerly Twitter) alone, the replay has, at the time of writing, garnered over 85 million views. This is not counting the millions who will have viewed it on Tucker Carlson’s website, via Russia Today and on the Kremlin’s website. Clips and social media reposts will further push Putin’s message to millions across the globe.

Beyond giving a platform for Putin to repeat his usual lies on history, NATO expansion and the war in Ukraine to a worldwide audience, the interview also underscored the close alignment of Donald Trump’s interests with those of the Kremlin.  

Trump/ Putin alignment

In one example out of many, Putin suggested that previous US presidents had been dissuaded by their advisors from integrating Russia into NATO or establishing a joint missile defence system with Europe. 

Carlson… nodded approvingly to Putin’s claims that the CIA has been pushing US foreign policy objectives at the expense of world peace. 

Carlson seized the moment to advance the Trump/MAGA narrative that democracy in the US is being undermined, remarking: ‘you’ve described US presidents making decisions and being undercut by their agencies. It sounds like you’re describing a system that’s not run by the people that are elected?’

Carlson also embraced Putin’s hostile view of NATO and nodded approvingly to Putin’s claims that the CIA has been pushing US foreign policy objectives at the expense of world peace. This echoes analysts’ warnings that a Trump presidency would see a radical overhaul of US foreign policy, US relations with NATO and the desire to apply strong presidential control over the civil service and government agencies, including the CIA.

The media frenzy…allowed the Kremlin to eclipse reporting on the Russian Central Electoral Commission’s decision on to bar anti-war candidate Boris Nadezhdin from the presidential ballot. 

Putin also pushed his narrative that the war in Ukraine would be over in weeks if the US stopped giving Ukraine weapons – which seems to complement Donald Trump’s assertion that once he becomes president, the war will be over in 24 hours.

Timing

The interview could not have come at a worse time. The US Senate is still hoping to pass a bill approving aid to Ukraine in spite of Republican resistance, and Carlson’s media event can only serve to sow further division and confusion within a party which believes Ukraine funding represents a useful electoral issue.

In a mutually self-serving twist, the media frenzy that Carlson generated in Russia also allowed the Kremlin to eclipse reporting on the Russian Central Electoral Commission’s decision on  8 February to bar anti-war candidate Boris Nadezhdin from the Russian presidential ballot in March. 

An unholy alliance

It was hard not to come away from the interview feeling that Carlson, a strong Trump supporter, and Vladimir Putin are batting for the same team. This is particularly worrying as polls suggest Trump will not only win the Republican nomination in the upcoming presidential elections, but the presidency itself. 

X was a useful platform for Putin: outside of the US and Japan, its largest audiences are located in the so-called Global South.

This opens the door to imagining an unholy Trump-Putin alliance bent on destroying the post Second World War international order and the institutions that are the foundations of liberal democracies. 

This would have fundamental implications for Europe’s defence and the UK’s identity and security, which has rested for more than 75 years on cooperation with the US through organizations like NATO. 

Article 2nd half

X was a useful platform for Putin: outside of the US and Japan, its largest audiences are located in the so-called Global South, including India, Brazil, and Indonesia – all prime targets for his propaganda machine. For Musk, unrestrained by regulation, streaming the interview in its entirety demonstrates his ability to exert considerable influence on politics in the US and beyond.

One often imagines the end of democracy as George Orwell’s ‘boot stamping on a human face – for ever.’ Perhaps the real end is coming through the continuing, subtle and relentless intrusion of corrosive narratives into homes, phones and brains, transmitted via a rapidly morphing media and technology landscape free of journalistic ethics. 

As Surkov warned in what now seems like another era, our consciousness is indeed being altered – and soon the US may be led by a president who simply does not care.