Arab states must adapt their Gaza peace plan and persuade Washington to engage with it

Israel is pursuing the illusion of total victory and likely plans to reoccupy Gaza. Arab countries must persuade President Trump that an alternative is better.

Expert comment Published 31 March 2025 Updated 16 April 2025 4 minute READ

On 18 March, Israel shattered the fragile ceasefire deal in Gaza with a renewed military assault. The ceasefire had enabled a vital break in the conflict, allowing desperately needed humanitarian aid to enter the Strip. Over 190 Israelis and foreign nationals, held captive since 7 October 2023, had also been released during the pause in fighting – alongside thousands of Palestinian prisoners in Israeli custody.

The resumption of the war has already claimed hundreds of Palestinian lives with high numbers of women and children among the dead and wounded. Politically, Israel, Hamas and the Palestinian Authority (PA) find themselves in a complex situation with no return to negotiations in sight.

Israel’s offensive has been denounced by Arab, European and other governments, and by many Israelis, although it has been supported by the US. Families of the Israeli hostages still held in Gaza accuse Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of sacrificing their loved ones for his political survival. They are supported by Israelis concerned for the state of their democracy as the prime minister attempts to oust senior officials and drive through changes to the judicial system.

Israel’s objectives

This time around, the statements and actions of the Israeli government suggest that the ultimate war objective is the military reoccupation of Gaza and to ‘encourage’ Palestinians to leave the territory for other countries.

The IDF has already drawn up plans which would see Gaza’s two million strong population confined to the al-Mawasi ‘humanitarian zone’ while the Israeli military administers Gaza as it did for four decades until 2005.

Earlier this week, a spokeswoman for Netanyahu announced the establishment of a Voluntary Emigration Bureau for Gaza residents interested in relocating to third countries, adding that this new entity will operate ‘in compliance with Israeli and international law’. These plans align with US President Donald Trump’s suggested proposal to displace Gaza’s population to Egypt and Jordan while transforming the Strip into a Middle Eastern riviera – an idea that caused UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres to warn against attempts to ethnically cleanse the territory.

Publicly Netanyahu continues to insist on achieving ‘total victory’ over Hamas. This despite the limited results of the past 18 months – manifest in the fact that Hamas still exists and continues to fire rockets and hold hostages.

The new assault on the Gaza Strip is not cost-free for Israel. It also risks destabilizing neighbouring Jordan and Egypt. Efforts to normalize relations with Saudi Arabia have been set back. Perhaps more significantly, international support for Israel after 7 October has shifted substantially after the deaths of over 50,000 Palestinians.

Palestinians’ lack of options

While Israel may be caught in a quagmire, Hamas is running out of choices. With its military capacity degraded it was forced to put all its hopes in the January ceasefire, insisting that it remained open to negotiations and calling for pressure on Israel to implement a truce. Hamas appears to have miscalculated the value of the Israeli hostages’ lives to Netanyahu’s government, which seems determined to escalate its military offensive regardless of the risks to the hostages.  

The PA clings to the vestiges of its legitimacy, hoping that the Arab plan for peace, adopted on 4 March, will be realized and somehow save it.

Recent anti-Hamas protests in Gaza will concern a movement that has seen almost no opposition to its rule since the beginning of the war in 2023, although it is too early to assess how Hamas will emerge from the war politically. Hamas continues to sustain a support base in the Strip, but visible public discontent may force it to further soften its positions. 

Meanwhile, the PA finds itself stuck once again in a difficult position. Its attempts to present itself as the legitimate representative of the Palestinians and win US support to resume government in Gaza have drastically failed.

The PA has dwindling legitimacy and credibility amongst Palestinians and is unable to exercise its authority inside the West Bank, following Israel’s escalated military operations and settler violence. President Mahmoud Abbas’s pledge to pardon exiled members of his own party Fatah hasn’t materialized yet, further undermining the possibility for unity talks between all Palestinian factions. Instead, the PA clings to the vestiges of its legitimacy, hoping that the Arab plan for peace, adopted on 4 March, will be realized and somehow save it.

Solutions

As Israeli plans to take over the Gaza Strip solidify, it is clear that the semi-solutions on the table, including an extension of phase one of the ceasefire, are not going to be enough for the region’s long-term needs.

A recent Egyptian bridging proposal to restore the ceasefire through an incremental hostage release and return to phase two of the January ceasefire may save lives. But it leaves the difficult issues that may set back the entire process unresolved and does not offer new guarantees for ending the war and Israeli withdrawal. It’s a good start but needs further development.

Article 2nd half

Arab states remain adamant in rejecting mass displacement – consistent with all international law governing conflict and the most recent opinions of the International Court of Justice.

The Arab plan for Gaza offers a comprehensive vision for a way out of the current impasse. The plan can provide a reasonable framework, if it further elaborates on the composition of the proposed ‘transitional administration’ that would govern Gaza under the ‘auspices of the PA’ and address Hamas’s weapons and political position in the Strip. 

For Israel, a reoccupation is politically and economically unsustainable – a step back in time in a region with a long memory.

Reports that Hamas leadership has expressed willingness to cede political power and administrative governance of the Gaza Strip to a Palestinian governing entity under the PA is encouraging and can be included in the Arab plan. Hamas’s disarmament can also be addressed by setting out a route to gradual disarmament as part of the Arab plan’s security provisions.

The viability of the Arab plan still depends on US support – only Washington can force Netanyahu to negotiate again. To that end, Arab states should pursue their plan, led by Saudi Arabia: President Trump has entrusted Riyadh with a prominent position in Russia-Ukraine peace talks and is seeking a $600 billion investment in the US. Saudi Arabia and Arab states should use this, and whatever other leverage they have, to help convince Trump to back their plan. It is a good plan, and there is no other as detailed and comprehensive on the table.

If there is no political process, Israel will reoccupy the Gaza Strip. For Israel, a reoccupation is politically and economically unsustainable – a step back in time in a region with a long memory. For the US, its credibility and interests in the region would be further undermined, and Trump’s second term will be forever associated with entrenching illegal occupation and heightening regional tensions.  

If the US perceives Israel’s future as lying in normalization and integration, it must support a solution that brings peace and security for both Israelis and Palestinians. Egypt and Jordan, the UAE and critically the Saudis are key to what happens next.